What difference do you see in the relationship between Lucky and Pozzo? Is there a reversal of roles in Act II? (MEG 104) (UNIT 3 CRITICAL ANALYSIS-II)

The relationship between Lucky and Pozzo in Samuel Beckett's "Waiting for Godot" undergoes a significant change in Act II compared to Act I. In Act I, Pozzo is the dominant figure, ordering Lucky around and treating him like a servant or animal. Lucky, in turn, is submissive and obedient, following Pozzo's orders without question.

However, in Act II, there is a reversal of roles between Lucky and Pozzo. Pozzo has lost his sight and is completely dependent on Lucky for guidance. This loss of power and control over his life has made Pozzo more vulnerable and reliant on Lucky. In contrast, Lucky has become more assertive and takes charge of Pozzo's care, guiding him around and caring for his needs. This reversal of roles is a stark contrast to their relationship in Act I, where Pozzo held all the power.

Furthermore, Lucky's long and nonsensical monologue in Act I, which highlights his role as a subservient and exploited figure, is replaced in Act II by his silence. He has lost his ability to speak and is reduced to carrying out his duties without any verbal expression. This change in his character emphasizes his powerlessness and vulnerability, but also his newfound strength and authority over Pozzo.

Overall, the reversal of roles between Lucky and Pozzo in Act II underscores the play's central themes of power, control, and vulnerability. It highlights the fragility of human existence and the inevitability of change and decay, as well as the complexities of human relationships and the shifting dynamics of power and authority.