How does the ending of Act II compare with the ending of Act I? Do you find the end of Act II more optimistic or pessimistic than that of Act I? If so why? Give examples. (MEG 104) (UNIT 3 CRITICAL ANALYSIS-II)

The ending of Act II in "Waiting for Godot" differs from that of Act I in several ways, and it can be interpreted as both more optimistic or pessimistic, depending on one's perspective.

In Act I, the play ends with Vladimir and Estragon deciding to leave, but ultimately staying put, as they wait for Godot to arrive. The arrival of Pozzo and Lucky provides a brief moment of distraction and entertainment, but ultimately does not change their situation. The final image of the act is of Vladimir and Estragon standing still, waiting.

In Act II, the play ends with the arrival of the boy, who brings news that Godot will not be coming that night, but will surely come tomorrow. This news prompts Vladimir and Estragon to briefly contemplate leaving, but they ultimately decide to stay put, once again. However, the final image of Act II is not one of waiting, but of movement, as Vladimir and Estragon try to leave, but are unable to do so.

The ending of Act II can be seen as more optimistic than Act I because of the promise of Godot's arrival the next day. This suggests that there is still hope and a possibility of change, despite the characters' seemingly futile situation. However, it can also be seen as more pessimistic, as the characters are still stuck in their cycle of waiting and unable to break free from it. The fact that they try to leave, but are unable to, suggests a sense of hopelessness and despair.

Overall, the ending of Act II is ambiguous and open to interpretation, much like the rest of the play. It can be seen as both more optimistic and more pessimistic than the ending of Act I, depending on one's perspective and reading of the play's themes and characters.