On what ground does Dryden attack the Metaphysical Poets? ( MEG 101 ) ( STUDY OF JOHN DONNE )

In his essay "A Discourse Concerning the Original and Progress of Satire," published in 1693, John Dryden criticizes the Metaphysical Poets for their use of complex and far-fetched imagery, their mixing of metaphors, and their lack of clarity and simplicity in style. Dryden argued that these poets were too concerned with showing off their wit and learning, at the expense of genuine emotion and clear expression.

According to Dryden, the Metaphysical Poets' use of elaborate conceits and obscure language made their poetry difficult to understand and appreciate. He also criticized their tendency to write about abstract and intellectual themes, rather than emotions and personal experiences. Dryden believed that poetry should aim to move and affect the reader, rather than merely impressing them with clever wordplay and obscure allusions.

Dryden's attack on the Metaphysical Poets was part of a larger debate about the nature and purpose of poetry that took place in the late seventeenth century. While some critics, such as Dryden, emphasized clarity and simplicity in poetic expression, others argued for the importance of wit, learning, and elaborate conceits. Nonetheless, Dryden's criticism had a significant impact on the reception of the Metaphysical Poets in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, with many critics dismissing their work as overly complicated and obscure.