Is the linguistic symbol "fabricated and feigned"? (MEG 101 CHAUCER)

 Is the linguistic symbol "fabricated and feigned"?

The question of whether linguistic symbols are "fabricated and feigned" depends on one's perspective and interpretation of what is meant by the terms "fabricated" and "feigned."

In one sense, all language is fabricated by humans, as it is a system of signs and symbols that we have created in order to communicate with each other. Language is not a natural phenomenon, but rather a human invention, and as such, it is in some sense "fabricated."

Similarly, one could argue that all linguistic symbols are "feigned" in that they are not the things or concepts they represent. For example, the word "tree" is not itself a tree, but a symbol that we use to refer to the concept of a tree. In this sense, all linguistic symbols are, to some degree, "feigned" or artificial.

However, this does not necessarily mean that linguistic symbols are in any way false or deceitful. Language and its symbols are a fundamental aspect of human communication and allow us to share our thoughts, feelings, and experiences with others. While they are in some sense "fabricated and feigned," they are also essential tools for navigating the world and connecting with others.