In what sense the human characters of the tile are in the background? [MEG 101 CHAUCER]

The human characters in the tale may be said to be in the background because the main focus is on the animals who are given human-like qualities and engage in human-like behaviors. The story is an allegory that uses animals to comment on the behavior and morals of humans, and the animals are the primary vehicles for this commentary. Additionally, the human characters in the tale, such as the farmer and his wife, are relatively undeveloped and serve primarily as foils for the animals. Their actions and motivations are simple and uncomplicated, and they do not have the same level of complexity or depth as the animal characters. Thus, while they play a role in the story, they are not the main focus and are not as fully realized as the animal characters.