Do you think that the real estimate of Dryden is not so high as the historical? What is your personal estimate of the poet? ( MEG 102 ) ( MAC FLECKNOE )

Dryden was a major figure in English literature in the late 17th century and is often regarded as one of the most important literary figures of his time. He wrote in a variety of genres, including poetry, drama, and prose, and was known for his wit, versatility, and critical acumen. He was also an influential literary critic, and his essays and prefaces helped to shape the literary tastes of his era.

However, there have been some critics who have questioned the high esteem in which Dryden is held. Some have argued that his work lacks emotional depth and complexity, and that his writing is sometimes formulaic and conventional. Others have suggested that his critical pronouncements were sometimes self-serving and that his poetry was too focused on topical issues of the day.

Despite these criticisms, Dryden's reputation as a major literary figure has endured. His influence on later writers, such as Alexander Pope and Samuel Johnson, was significant, and his works continue to be studied and appreciated by literary scholars and enthusiasts.

In summary, while there have been some criticisms of Dryden's work, his reputation as a major literary figure remains largely intact. His contributions to English literature in the 17th century and his influence on later writers are significant and enduring.