The neo-classical Age in English poetry was not classical enough, Why? ( MEG 102 ) ( THE AGE OF DRYDEN )

The neo-classical age in English poetry, which spanned the late 17th and early 18th centuries, was a period marked by a return to classical literary forms and values. However, despite its focus on classical ideals, many critics argue that the poetry of this period was not classical enough.

One reason for this is that the poetry of the neo-classical age often lacked the depth and complexity of classical literature. While neo-classical poets such as Alexander Pope and John Dryden emulated the formal structures and language of classical poetry, their work often lacked the philosophical and spiritual depth of classical works such as the epics of Homer or the tragedies of Sophocles.

Another reason why the neo-classical age was not considered classical enough was its emphasis on reason and clarity. While classical literature was marked by a complex interplay of emotions and ideas, neo-classical poetry often favored clarity and rationality over emotional complexity. This focus on reason and rationality can be seen in the use of heroic couplets, a formal verse structure that emphasized wit, satire, and intellectual complexity, rather than the exploration of personal emotions and feelings.

Finally, the neo-classical age was also marked by a growing interest in science, politics, and the social order. This preoccupation with the practical and empirical aspects of life stood in contrast to the more idealistic and transcendent concerns of classical literature. As a result, the poetry of this period often lacked the sense of wonder and awe that characterized classical literature.

Overall, while the neo-classical age in English poetry did attempt to emulate classical ideals, it fell short in capturing the depth and complexity of classical literature. Despite this, however, the poetry of this period remains a significant and influential part of the English literary canon.